First, from Lady MacBeth's desperate campaign in PA, from the
Politico Blog:
Clinton has her own harsh gun robocall out, painting Obama as the anti-gun liberal that most people thought both of them were until sometime earlier this month:
"Hello, this is Hillary Clinton for president calling. Barack Obama is not telling the truth about his past position on the Second Amendment.
As an Illinois state Senator, he supported a ban on all handguns, and he even personally filled out a questionnaire saying he supported the ban. Now instead of telling you the truth about that, he's trying to cover it up, saying he never saw the questionnaire -- even though his handwriting was on it.
And Obama voted to give millions of dollars to anti-gun organizations that are trying to take away our gun rights.
This is just another example of Barack Obama saying one thing, and doing another -- and yet another issue John McCain will use against Obama to win in November."
These guys are just great, aren't they? Both of them would like to march every one of us who owns a gun into "re-education camps" or just shoot us down in the street...but they want our votes! I say, vote for Lady MacBeth as the
Least Electable Demo-Liar! BTW, I saw this next item over at
Say Uncle, and it
just cracked me up. It's a
correction published in the
New York Red Star, er,
Times about one of their typical, slanted antigun stories:
This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:
Correction: April 18, 2008
Because of an editing error, an article on Tuesday about efforts by state lawmakers across the country to pass new restrictions on guns referred imprecisely to the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence. While it supports some firearms restrictions and enforcement of legal regulations on gun ownership, it is not an “antigun group.”
HELLO IN THERE! As Uncle noted, some idiot editor at the Times wrote this with a straight face... here's a helpful hint for NYT editors: It is perfectly truthful, acceptable and appropriate to refer the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence as
"antigun swine," "lying antigun weasels," or, simply,
"liars."
Lol, 'anti-gun swine' has my vote, it's harsh but well deserved.
ReplyDeleteNugget from National Review:
ReplyDelete'Hillary's been running around talking like she spends all her time in a duck blind,' - said the candidate who bowled 37 for the cameras.
It seems that "The Beast" and
ReplyDelete"b-HO" both want to deceive us, so that no one will bring up the "gun issue". This evening, on the nightly news, the left-wing Dem'crap shills talked about Mexico's drug traffickers buying guns at US "gun shows", then smuggling them back home, only to wage a war with their polizei. They showed full-autos, M-60s and the FN 5.7 which they showed penetrating body armor; all the usual deceit. The message was anti-gun in the US first, as they mentioned the 2nd-A. Then get this: they asked Bush to do more to prevent the guns from being smuggled into Mexico. They went on to suggest that we need more agents, etc. More crap, without any real solution to the root cause.
So, let me get this straight. Mexico won't do anything about the smuggling of drugs into the US, nor do anything about the steady stream of ILLEGALs sneaking into MY country, but we're supposed to stop the drug smugglers from using their ILLEGAL profits to buy legal and ILLEGAL guns and smuggling them back there. If they're illegal guns, we already have laws to stop that. If they're illegal, then Mex' should get on the ball on the other side of the fence! Taking away my rights won't solve the problem!
God help us if the left-wingers get into full control.
Life Member