Thursday, May 21, 2009

TSA Follows

So "sniffers" at airports are now scrapped because they didn't actually sniff as well as a beagle with a head cold...so today I had to go through one of the microscanners...

When I came out, the TSA personnel informed me that thanks to the scanner, I'd be a lot safer. Then they asked for permission to pat me down. They found a piece of paper in my pocket, which they triumphantly extracted.

So, I said sweetly, if the scanner is so great why'd you have to pat me down? The piece of paper, he said. So how am I safer if the scanner can't tell the difference between a piece of paper and a rocket launcher while giving Mr. Weasel his 15 minutes of fame, I asked?

Big scowl...we take our security seriously here, he says.

Cool, I say...when can I expect to see the pics on the Internet?

Scowl!


-- Post From The Road

20 comments:

  1. Marshalette Halloway10:24 AM

    heh heh heh... sorry I missed it.. but on second thought .. better that I did. Yours and my personality type together usually don't add up to calm and serene.. Marshal would have probably had to bail us out of TSA Timeout!.
    LOL

    Keep at 'em Michael.. Keep at 'em..
    *grinning*

    ReplyDelete
  2. Kristopher11:15 AM

    "We take our security theatre seriously ..."

    ReplyDelete
  3. If the sniffers worked you'd never get on a plane again, MB.

    With the amount of time you spend around gunpowder the damn thing would have a fit if it really worked! :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Rastus11:30 AM

    So they like to rifle the pockets for paper. Sounds like an opportunity to put a note in...maybe a TSA "dis" with a monkey making faces or something...

    Sorry, just feeling a bit irreverent and impertinent today. I got put on rant mode yesterday...time to back it down a notch.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous11:39 AM

    Sorry but nothing man made works as well and reproducibly as a dog for drugs or explosives.

    Michael don't tease the folks from TSA. I heard they don't change gloves after cavity searches. It's falls under cost cutting.

    Ratcatcher55

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous11:55 AM

    For fun and entertainment, you should make some customer underwear out of this stuff: http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/wti0001p?&I=LXMUW5&P=FR

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous1:15 PM

    Kind of why I mostly travel by car. The very sight of the TSA bureaucrats raise my blood pressure and anger level. I'd rather deal with terrorists than have to deal with those morons.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous1:59 PM

    The next time I fly I'll print out a copy of the Constitution on a sheet of paper, front and back, and still that in my pocket.

    Let's see what fun I can have with that.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I understand why you have to fly, but my wife and I refuse to fly. You combine the facts that TSA measures still wouldn't stop a determined terrorist from getting on a plane with weaponry (thank you to my high school teachers who were Green Berets in Vietnam for teaching me improvised weapons), and the complete ineptitude of the majority of TSA screeners (they used to be the lowest paid security guards in the industry for a reason) and it's just not worth flying to anywhere you can drive to.

    ReplyDelete
  10. The pointy question is, "What danger to the plane is a piece of paper, that makes it the government's business?"

    ReplyDelete
  11. I love it, sounds cool. Now the question is how long does it take the guy at the sniffer to radio back to the dude in baggage claim to make sure that your Para Carry 9 gets "LOST"

    (That still is your carry gun right?)

    ReplyDelete
  12. Matthew Carberry7:03 PM

    Was it just that they couldn't identify the piece of paper or are they requiring empty pockets now?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Pre-9/11, I decided to test those 'explosive' sniffers. I took Bullseye powder and rubbed as much as I could all over the cover of my IBM Thinkpad. I mean, I could even smell it several hours later. The security guard (pre TSA) rubbed her "swab" over the laptop and put it in the detector. GREEN LIGHT!

    ReplyDelete
  14. I also, after having my carry-on bags completely hand search, was told by a security guard how much safer flying was now. I replied, "Oh, yeah. "I" feel so much safer now that you've searched "my" possessions."

    ReplyDelete
  15. "we take our security seriously here, he says."
    He either lied like a rug, or is too brainwashed to understand how silly that comment is. I understand they have a tough, thankless job, but the lack of common sense displayed every time I fly blows my mind.

    ReplyDelete
  16. BTW, I am of the understanding that their software can also allow them to sniff for more than just nitrate compounds. If this is correct, then they can also sniff for cocaine and other illegal drugs. Could that be construed as illegal search and seizure? It is just more of the same in my opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  17. The TSA here in Orlando has it's own set of problems:

    http://aroundotown.blogspot.com/2009/04/whos-going-through-your-luggage-and.html

    ReplyDelete
  18. Perhaps the threat was the notes Michael had written on the paper.

    These machines are so good that they can even read the writing on hidden documents....must have been some black rifle notes written there...

    ReplyDelete
  19. We have had other problems at our airport as well this week:

    http://aroundotown.blogspot.com/2009/05/man-assaults-flight-crew-at-oia.html

    ReplyDelete
  20. Clark Kent8:32 AM

    Microdots with bin Laden's instructions in the letters? Yeah, that's the ticket!

    ReplyDelete