This from our
friends at Brady, through the
Huffington Post:
The challenge now is for our elected officials to realize that supporting things like Brady background checks to keep criminals and terrorists from buying guns from legitimate sources, and enforcing the laws applicable to gun dealers to make sure they don't contribute to the market in illegal guns by allowing straw purchases, makes good sense from a political as well a policy perspective.
Hmmmmm...so what does Mr. Helmke have to say to
USA Today?
Advocates expect Democrats to avoid culture wars
•Gun control: Paul Helmke, president of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, says he has seen a list of the top 100 Democratic priorities; reinstating the now-expired ban on military-style assault weapons is "in the 90s." At least, he says, conservatives can't weaken gun control laws.
But wait! Let's go to the
New York Times:
America’s confusion about the Second Amendment is now nearly total. An amendment that ensures a collective right to bear arms has been misread in one legislature after another — often in the face of strong public disapproval — as a law guaranteeing an individual’s right to carry a weapon in public. And, in a perversion of monumental proportions, the battle to extend that right has largely succeeded in co-opting the language of the Civil Rights movement, so that depriving an American of the right to carry a gun in public sounds, to some, as offensive as stripping him of the right to vote.
Just keeping tabs!
2 comments:
depriving an American of the right to carry a gun in public sounds, to some, as offensive as stripping him of the right to vote.
Uh...isn't it?
Remember, the Fourth only applies if you are a Dem congresscritter with $90K stashed in the freezer.
Post a Comment