Thursday, June 30, 2011

Whew!

Have survived another premiere week! As of this morning, both Tim Cremin and I are extremely pleased with the response to both GUN STORIES and the new season of TBD/SURVIVAL, and at least for the time being, no one wants my head on a block. Before I head off to shoot the 2-day Hell on Wheels cowboy action shooting regional up in Cheyenne, I wanted to touch on a couple of subjects.

First (and speaking of wanting my head on a block), years back — good grief, can it be almost a decade? — I stepped up to the podium at the largest hunting conclave ever to say that taxation without representation was still tyranny. I was speaking of the Pittman-Robertson funds, of course, derived from tax monies on guns, ammunition, components, etc. Those monies, in the hundreds of millions of dollars each year, have gone to wildlife restoration, wetland purchases, hunter education and funding state fish and game departments and programs. A tiny tiny trickle of the money also went into shooting ranges.

The problem that we saw, based on research from me and Paul Erhardt, was that the there had been a profound change in the market from hunting to shooting, and that change had not been reflected in the allocation of P-R funds. The steady decline of hunting, combined with the meteoric rise of competition shooting and training, coupled with CCW-driven birth and rise to prominence of Gun Culture Ver. 2.0 meant that we represented a majority of the taxes being paid. But 99.99% of the funds were going to hunting/conservation.

I'm not knocking hunting/conservation at all, but come on! We're dying for shooting ranges and awash in ducks! I made the decision to step up to the plate and declare the emperor had no clothes. I will say it got a bit (a big bit) hot in the kitchen......axe...block...neck, etc.

But we won.

The industry has come around to the view that the shooting/training/CCW Ver. 2.0 gun culture is the future. By industry numbers, hunting now ranks 4th as a driver. And now the next steps...refining Pittman-Robertson. This from Senator Mark Udall's (D-CO) office, about Senate Bill S-1249 — Target Practice and Marksmanship Training Support Act:
Today, Mark Udall re-introduced legislation to help states construct and maintain safe public shooting ranges. The bill, the Target Practice and Marksmanship Training Support Act, would help ensure that there are enough accessible ranges where hunters and marksmen can safely practice recreational shooting.
Under current law – the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act – an excise tax is collected on sporting equipment and ammunition, which states can use for activities such as wildlife restoration and hunter education programs. However, it has limited effectiveness in establishing and maintaining shooting ranges, which are declining in number. Udall’s Target Practice and Marksmanship Training Support Act, co-sponsored by Senators Jim Risch, Michael Bennet and Jon Tester, would amend the law to give states more flexibility to use existing funds to create and maintain shooting ranges.
“The number of places in our communities and on public lands where Colorado sportsmen and women can safely shoot and target practice has steadily dwindled,” Udall said. “This bill would give states more flexibility to use federal dollars – that have already been allocated to them – to create safe, new public places to shoot. It would be a triple win for sporting and conservation communities: states can create higher quality and safer shooting ranges, more Coloradans can take up the sport, and it would generate more money for future conservation and hunter education efforts.”
Udall’s bill would:
• Increase the amount of money states can contribute from their allotted Pittman-Robertson funds to 90 percent of the cost to improve or construct a public target range from the current limit of 75 percent. This would reduce local and state matching requirements from 25 percent to 10 percent.
• Allow the Pittman-Robertson funds allotted to a state to remain available and accrue for five fiscal years for use in acquiring land for, expanding, or constructing a public target range on federal or non-federal land. Under current law, states must use these funds within one year.
• Limit the legal liability exposure to the federal land management agencies regarding the management and use of federal land for target practice or marksmanship training.
• Encourage the federal land management agencies to cooperate with state and local authorities to maintain target ranges on federal land so as to encourage their continued use.
The bill is fully supported by NSSF, which has taken the lead in allocating P-R funds to shooting ranges through their innovative grant system.
NSSF Applauds Introduction of the Target Practice and Marksmanship Training Act in Senate
June 27, 2011 By Larry Keane
NEWTOWN, Conn. – The National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), the trade association for the firearms, ammunition, hunting and shooting sports industry, applauded the introduction of the Target Practice and Marksmanship Training Act by Sen. Mark Udall (D-CO). This bi-partisan legislation will give states greater flexibility to use more of their designated federal wildlife resources (i.e. Pittman-Robertson funds) to establish safe recreational shooting areas. More specifically, the legislation will help facilitate the construction and expansion of public target ranges, including ranges on federal land managed by the U.S. Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management.
“We appreciate Sen. Udall’s leadership in fighting for safe, accessible shooting facilities,” said Lawrence G. Keane, senior vice president and general counsel of the National Shooting Sports Foundation. “This legislation clears the way for new shooting ranges and allows for the proper management of existing ones. Access to these facilities is paramount to continuing to pass on our hunting and shooting sports heritage to younger generations.”
A recent survey by the Responsive Management Company has show that the biggest obstacle to participation in hunting and the shooting sports is access. In addressing this concern, the Target Practice and Marksmanship Training Act will not only help sportsmen and target shooters, but wildlife and conservation efforts as well. Active participation in hunting and the shooting sports means increased production of firearms and ammunition. Manufacturers of firearms and ammunition pay a federal excise tax — 11 percent on long guns and ammunition and 10 percent on handguns — which is used to fund wildlife and conservation efforts. By giving gun owners better access to ranges, the Target Practice and Marksmanship Training Act will help to encourage participation in these pro-conservation pastimes.
By allowing the states more latitude in determining how excise tax dollars are used to enhance and develop public shooting facilities, wildlife conservation funding will increase. This benefits all sportsmen and is a strong return on investment.
This is HUGE! One of the baseline strategies of our enemies — perhaps the only one that has been working, BTW — has been to deprive us of places to shoot. A significant amount of revenue flowing into range development, coupled with pushing federal land management agencies to allow land for ranges (a big issue here in Colorado), is a very important start.

Personally, I will not be happy until we have parity, that is, until the P-R funds are allocated by percentage based on industry-derived numbers. If shooting/training/CCW represents 60% of the purchasing activity in an given year, then 60% of the P-R funds should be allocated for programs that benefit that segment of the industry.

Taxation without representation is always tyranny, no matter how well-intentioned the goals for that taxation are!

Thank you, Senator Udall, and thank you, NSSF!

25 comments:

Anonymous said...

Very well said. I have been pushing our Montana delegation on this issue for six years. Election year and soft on gun issues is Tester's only reason for support, but we'll take it for now.

M & B Strategies/47-North

Pathfinder said...

Let's hope Udall's bill passes. We are applying for PR funds for a new underground rifle range to accompany our already built pistol-only range.

kmitch200 said...

Path, I hope you get your underground range. What a great way to get around noise complaints! Suburban encroachment on current ranges and the noise whining is a HUGE deal everywhere. Even though the ranges were there decades before the houses.
Lets all celebrate if this bill goes through.

Darrell said...

There is a recent arfcom CO hometown forum thread about destruction in local national forests caused by irresponsible shooters, and bemoaning the lack of available public ranges. The Rampart Range incident, came up, of course. The thread linked a story from the Springs paper about the destruction:

The arfcom thread:


http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=8&f=20&t=455378

The original article:

http://www.outtherecolorado.com/blogs/illegal-shooters-leave-the-forest-a-battlefield-of-splintered-trees.html

DamDoc said...

Mr. Bane.. I just watched my dvr of your show (couldn't watch last night)... i just want to say that "Gun Stories" is a first class show.. it is definately kicking it up a notch. The music, the way you did the various shots.. joe"s hosting/narration.. it was really cinematography... i loved it. Great job! Cudos.

Ulmus said...

This is great news! I'll be doing my part through calls and letter writing to get support for this through my reps.

Thank you for letting us know about this.

It's a great Birthday present.

Primeval Papa said...

"I'm not knocking hunting/conservation at all, but come on! We're dying for shooting ranges and awash in ducks! "

Really? We have more than enough game and access? I agree with the proposed changes to the P-R act but for some reason this phase raised some hackles. I am one of those who participate in both hunting and shooting sports. So are you promoting the shooting side since there is more than enough game and access? I can hardly believe that this was put out there as any sort of reason for change. I am sure that the next thing I will hear is that it was supposed to be humorous. I would expect that your meeting was contentious if this was also part of the presentation.
I'm not knocking you at all but come on! I really am.

kmitch200 said...

So are you promoting the shooting side since there is more than enough game and access?

I think it's called fairness.
Amounts of game vary by region and access could and should have been dealt with several hundred million dollars ago.
Are shooters supposed to BOHICA until there is "more than enough game" for every hunter in every corner of the USA and THEN they get a fair shake?
I call bullshit.

Primeval Papa said...

"I call bullshit"

You completely miss the point. You will have a harder time promoting the redistribution of funds by starting off with any statement that says, "You have enough." One must stick to the premise that we want a fair share set up for shooting ranges as we pay into this via the P-R Act also.

nj_larry said...

Can I ask the un-askable? Sure, go ahead. Ok I will...

Who said the Federal Gov't should collect the Pittman-Robertson tax and then they would know best how to use it? Aren't we trying to get control of something WE stupid people let get out of control years ago? Let's see it starts out as MY FREAKING MONEY, then the gov't takes it, then some fat butt bureaucrat in Washington DC says this is how you spend it. Hmmmm ... something about this doesn't sound right.

I may be way off base folks, but isn't that how this modern Tea Party stuff got started a couple of years ago. That people are tired, no, damm tired of having THEIR money filtered thru Washington DC? Why aren't we asking to REPEAL Pittman-Robertson?

Anonymous said...

You will have a harder time promoting the redistribution of funds by starting off with any statement that says, "You have enough."

Let me assure you that Michael never started off the P-R funds argument with "you have enough". The argument has always been that shooters drive a large percentage of the P-R funds which are derived from FET on firearms, ammunition and archery equipment, and should therefore receive more of the benefits of the taxes they pay. Consider the FET paid into the P-R account from Glock, Sig, Smith & Wesson, Kahr, Springfield Armory, HK, all the "black rifle" companies, just to name a few. The bulk of these dollars, generated by shooters, to to promote hunting.

Unfortunately, while P-R numbers make up a large portion of state agency budgets, these same state fish & wildlife agencies have no increased their share of budget dollars from sources outside of P-R funds and licenses and fees. Even though the population has grown and the work/mission of the agencies expanded.

The reason that fish & wildlife agencies hate this argument is because it directly threatens their budgets. They want shooters to remain quiet while they spend the P-R dollars.

It was never a "you have enough" argument, it's always been a "taxation without representation" argument...with data, and perhaps the majority of payees, on our side.

- Paul Erhardt

MulberryNews said...

Even 1 man can certainly vftbieg adorn when using the Oakley Frogskins sundry forms of colour Cheap Oakley Sunglasses supports from reddish colored, purple, brown leafy, azure so forth. pick your almost sort in addition to present it clear of with beneficial panache. Oakley Frogskin aren't only for vogue and serve as a general protective shield with the eyes. eye projectiles Oakley Jawbone are gentle and ought to be used focus of when using the most useful excellent merchandise. getting that aspects note, the artisan Oakley Jawbones are greatest concerning most useful defense in addition to elegance.

MulberryNews said...

Even 1 man can certainly vftbieg adorn when using the Oakley Frogskins sundry forms of colour Cheap Oakley Sunglasses supports from reddish colored, purple, brown leafy, azure so forth. pick your almost sort in addition to present it clear of with beneficial panache. Oakley Frogskin aren't only for vogue and serve as a general protective shield with the eyes. eye projectiles Oakley Jawbone are gentle and ought to be used focus of when using the most useful excellent merchandise. getting that aspects note, the artisan Oakley Jawbones are greatest concerning most useful defense in addition to elegance.

MulberryNews said...

Acquiring mentioned Oakley Sunglasses Outlet of which, this vftbieg is actually an clue towards typical individuals who qualified Half X aren't the pot connected with tea. But not Oakley Stpl Jawbone to ever get nervous as there may be commonly an answer for many problem. Replica or maybe not high-priced Oakley Jawbone are the warm stuffs this holiday season, that is probably acquiring big recognition throughout Sale Oakley Sunglasses the typical part on the society. These Oakley Sunglasses Discount reasons damage on your delicate little brown eyes. Comparing having other Half X Oakley, the Oakley Sunglasses Cheap are considerably more effective in addition to let considerably more versatile fun of apparent support in addition to vision safeguard.

MulberryNews said...

Since Oakley Frogskins turned vftbieg style add-ons with day-to-day lifetime, they're not any lengthier this economical objects. You could very well invest a lot of cash with Oakley Frogskin between hundreds bucks to a lot even far more. contemplating this massive acquire you place on them, fantastic Cheap Oakley Sunglasses attention advisors isn't solely important although essential. Even from the celebration people Oakley Jawbone didn't invest lots money, supplying typical attention is usually important. from the celebration you choose to do that, you would possibly maintain ones Oakley Jawbones in excellent form for virtually every extended time period.

MulberryNews said...

The many types vytrqpn of wrapa Oakley Sunglasses Cheap get not deserted their fashion along with acceptance. This summer, your wrapa Half X Oakley using complete along with fine design and style happens returning straight into fashion Oakley Sunglasses Discount yet again, containing depicted your riches along with high-class Sale Oakley Sunglasses involving girls frankly. Firmoo's give back along with repayment insurance would likely create your current obtain using Firmoo Oakley Jawbone risk-free. examine out and about each of our $8 Oakley Stpl Jawbone, $10 along with thirty greenback Half X support frames to suit your funds along with sight requires. Since first design Oakley Sunglasses Outlet, these are acknowledged by simply numerous men and women.
The many types vytrqpn of wrapa Oakley Sunglasses Cheap get not deserted their fashion along with acceptance. This summer, your wrapa Half X Oakley using complete along with fine design and style happens returning straight into fashion Oakley Sunglasses Discount yet again, containing depicted your riches along with high-class Sale Oakley Sunglasses involving girls frankly. Firmoo's give back along with repayment insurance would likely create your current obtain using Firmoo Oakley Jawbone risk-free. examine out and about each of our $8 Oakley Stpl Jawbone, $10 along with thirty greenback Half X support frames to suit your funds along with sight requires. Since first design Oakley Sunglasses Outlet, these are acknowledged by simply numerous men and women.

yunya212 said...

Many guys use Oakley Frogskin for just two good czw6rf reasons : seeking excellent and also guarding face. Yet buying the completely wrong head wear or perhaps Oakley Frogskins can easily eliminate the frame of mind. This informative article looks at several 7 getting suggestions. Ensure you might be investing in a great couple of fantastic seeking Oakley Jawbones in which can feel normal on your own face. They need to furthermore offer you a sense regarding success. Thus test to find out Oakley Jawbonethe design or perhaps dimensions right for an individual. When you have a smaller confront, you need to be sporting more compact Cheap Oakley Sunglasses.

oakley oil rig sunglasses said...

The particular Cheap Oakley Sunglasses could possibly be followed rear on the 60s, after the Oakley Frogskins earlier zvwauwq 1st girl Jackie Kennedy Onassis Oakley Frogskin started off the particular well-known spherical, large sun shades. massive spectacles in the end began to be well-liked while using the younger Us citizens, and Oakley Radar also preserved their particular popularity as yet. Rome Hilton and also Nicole Richie are usually a couple of excellent superstar cases which gorgeously stone the particular Oakley Radar Sunglasses.

Oakley Jawbone said...

The reason mnbgqhj why the Oakley Frogskins can block the UV ray is that the lenses are coated with a layer of special film. Such Oakley Frogskin can block and absorb the UV ray as well as some visible light Cheap Oakley Sunglasses at the same time, which will reduce the transmittance of the lens. Therefore, the superior-quality Oakley Jawbone have strong resistance to the UV ray. Moreover, the coating on the lens is relatively hard and not easy to be abraded. As for how to determine whether a pair of cheap wholesale Oakley Jawbones is with UV protection function.

yunya212 said...

In many instances, these are speedily harmed. For that reason, we should hsddrefsj instead hold cure of our own Cheap Oakley Sunglasses whenever you can. Zero make a difference where by anyone position your current Oakley Frogskins, you may need to be aware of that will position your eyeglass contact lenses while in the second facet. Should you be thinking of receiving some Oakley Frogskin, in this article are generally amount of rules with regards to tips on how to invest in the perfect one particular. Oakley Radar get transform into a new need to for each and every player, motorcycle while Oakley Radar Sunglasses effectively because people involving playing golf, the game of golf, cricket along with mineral water activities and the like.

Generic Levitra said...

hello..!
it's a great post. i am a regular reader of your post.keep posting.



Generic Viagra,

roger vivier said...

Soldes sur les chaussures couture. Envie d'une paire de chaussures haute des splendides modèles Roger Vivier crees pour Christian Dior Haute Couture Roger Vivier .Christian Louboutin a rejoint la filiale legendaire Dior "Roger Vivier de fournir? un professionnel pour faire des chaussures vivier shoes . If you can't get the preotwuq back of those Roger Vivier at least on the premise that wearing roger vivier chaussures resulted in less roger vivier heels .La paire de sandales ? show off ? de la collection de chaussures Roger Vivier printemps ete 2011. Munie dun talon aiguille vxzcvbaa ,elle resplendit.On peut, par exemple, trouver des soldes chaussures sur des Converse chez ASOS roger vivier chaussures , des Puma chez Yoox ou Roger Vivier chez MyTheresa. Roger vivier helps you cathch the fashion styla and athletes from around the same high school,wholesale roger vivier chaussures shoes. Art de chaussure. Roger Vivier, bottier styliste, a habille les pieds les plus celebres, de Brigitte bardot a la reine angleterre.

roger vivier said...

Amongst shots for Blake Vivid throughout the on roll movie dojo for Chat Girlfriend roger vivier flats, your sweetheart applied the Dean roger vivier flats .After a few seconds, criminals has been controlled, Buy cheap Roger Vivier flats and take away from the vehicle vxzcvbaa . Explosive-handling robot roger vivier pumps .Tagged With: airport style ? balenciaga bag ? freida pinto Priyanka Chopra roger vivier flats Shilpa shetty tod's roger vivier sale .The new look I want you to notice is roger vivier flats ! We have switched themes and are in love with the Genesis framework!

pharmacy said...

Great post! Keep it up the good work and also keep posting.

extreme lesbian bondage said...

Great website, looks very clean and organized. Keep up the good work!