Saturday, June 02, 2007

Fred Thompson on the Second Amendment

All joking aside, with Fred Thompson set to enter the Presidential race next month, EVERY ONE OF US needs to understand what is at stake in 2008.

The three current serious Republican contenters include Rudy "I Helped Bill Clinton Pass Gun Laws!" Giuliani; John "Gun Show Loopholes and We Don't Need No Stinkin' First Amendment!" McCain and Mitt "Lifelong Hunter" Romney — all three with flawless antigun credentials! Let 'em twist and weasel however they want...their views are the public record.

On the Democratic side, we have a choice between rock star Barack "Ban Everything" Obama and Hillary "Ban Everything" Clinton, with pro-gun Bill Richardson out there in Never-Never Land.

Fred Thompson can win this thing.

Here's what he thinks about the foremost issue in our minds...

On the Second Amendment —"If you care about constitutional law, and everybody should, the big news is that it looks as if the Supreme Court is going to hear a Second Amendment case some time next year. The event that sparked this legal fuse was a case brought by six D.C. residents who simply wanted functional firearms in their homes for self-defense. In response, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit struck down the District’s 31-year-old gun ban — one of the strictest in the nation.

Our individual right to keep and bear arms, as guaranteed by the Bill of Rights, may finally be confirmed by the high Court; but this means that we’re going to see increasing pressure on the Supreme Court from anti-gun rights activists who want the Constitution reinterpreted to fit their prejudices."

On the Virginia Tech nightmare — "Virginia, like 39 other states, allows citizens with training and legal permits to carry concealed weapons. That means that Virginians regularly sit in movie theaters and eat in restaurants among armed citizens. They walk, joke and rub shoulders everyday with people who responsibly carry firearms -- and are far safer than they would be in San Francisco, Oakland, Detroit, Chicago, New York City, or Washington, D.C., where such permits are difficult or impossible to obtain.

The statistics are clear. Communities that recognize and grant Second Amendment rights to responsible adults have a significantly lower incidence of violent crime than those that do not. More to the point, incarcerated criminals tell criminologists that they consider local gun laws when they decide what sort of crime they will commit, and where they will do so."

On gun control — Thompson opposes gun control, praising a recent federal appeals decision overturning a long-standing handgun ban in Washington, D.C.: "The court basically said the Constitution means what it says, and I agree with that."

• His voting record:
Voted NO on background checks at gun shows. (May 1999)
Voted NO on more penalties for gun & drug violations. (May 1999)
Voted YES on loosening license & background checks at gun shows. (May 1999)
Voted YES on maintaining current law: guns sold without trigger locks. (Jul 1998)
Voted NO on $1.15 billion per year to continue the COPS program. (May 1999)
Voted YES on limiting death penalty appeals. (Apr 1996)
Voted YES on limiting product liability punitive damage awards. (Mar 1996)
Voted YES on restricting class-action lawsuits. (Dec 1995)
Voted YES on repealing federal speed limits. (Jun 1995)
Voted YES on increasing penalties for drug offenses. (Nov 1999)
Voted YES on spending international development funds on drug control. (Jul 1996)
Voted NO on adding sexual orientation to definition of hate crimes. (Jun 2002)
Voted NO on loosening restrictions on cell phone wiretapping. (Oct 2001)
Voted NO on expanding hate crimes to include sexual orientation. (Jun 2000)
Voted NO on setting aside 10% of highway funds for minorities & women. (Mar 1998)
Voted NO on ending special funding for minority & women-owned business. (Oct 1997)
Voted YES on prohibiting same-sex marriage. (Sep 1996)
Voted NO on prohibiting job discrimination by sexual orientation. (Sep 1996)
Voted YES on Amendment to prohibit flag burning. (Dec 1995)
Voted NO on banning affirmative action hiring with federal funds. (Jul 1995)
Voted YES on authorizing use of military force against Iraq. (Oct 2002)
Voted YES on allowing all necessary force in Kosovo. (May 1999)
Voted NO on authorizing air strikes in Kosovo. (Mar 1999)
Voted YES on ending the Bosnian arms embargo. (Jul 1995)
Gun Owners of America ratings — "He has no need to convince voters that he has changed his ways and now sees the light, because he has been fairly consistent throughout his career."

Here is the bottom line, folks — we in the gun culture do NOT have a second choice! Fred Thompson is our candidate; let's get him elected!

And could we please please have Condolezza Rice as VP?


Hazcat said...

The only major faux pas that I know of is that he voted for McCain-Feingold campaign reform.

That aside as some one said in the post below he is the only Republican I could vote for.

Anonymous said...

My neighbor would make a great President in '08, too; neither he nor Thompson will be elected--neither one knows how to campaign. If Thompson were serious about this he would have begun prepping and campaigning 10+ yrs. ago. He will not even make the Final Four.

gunman42782 said...

Fred has my vote.

Civis Proeliator said...

Fred Thompson & John Bolton in '08! Yeah, it's a pipe dream but can't you just imagine the mass implosion of hollow, leftist cranial cavities?

Anonymous said...

'08 will likely be a bloodbath for Republicans. Gun owners would probably do better supporting Bill Richardson. I see '08 as having the potential to be a realignment much like Reagan's election in 1980. Thanks W!

Anonymous said...

Sportsmen for Thompson. I can see the bumperstickers now. Send me one when they get printed.

Anonymous said...

Go Fred Go! Now we have a candidate for president. Thank God.

Anonymous said...

Richardson is a Clintonista and Socialist.
Fred Thompson is niether of those.
I think he is smart to sit back and let the field narrow down a bit before he wates a lot of campain dollars in the early stages of this game; like by entering into a debate with "We had it comming" Ron Paul.
Rob L

Joel said...

Funny, I find Ron Paul to be a much more attractive candidate than any other so-called republican. Is there any other candidate in either party that wants to reduce government spending and control?

Anonymous said...

Hopefully we can trust his record and what Fred is saying his view of the 2nd. Until now I was seriously considering not voting in the presidental race for the first time since I could vote (1988). I'll be putting my hopes aside and scrutinizing for real convictions and guts. Would be nice to see his NRA life membership card...

bmxer015 said...

its funny that you really dont even mention Ron Paul, who by the way has never voted against the 2nd amendment and was given an "A" rating by the NRA. Go Ron Paul!