Friday, November 14, 2008

Here's the Battleground, Kids

From John Rosenthal on HuffPO:
President-elect Obama should implement seven tested and proven initiatives that will have an immediate impact on reducing gun related violence, accidents and suicides without affecting the Second Amendment or having any negative impact on responsible and law abiding gun owners.

Of the average 34,000 gun deaths in the US every year approximately 11,000 are homicides, 18,000 are suicides and 5,000 are unintentional accidents. We can change these horrific numbers.

If I were President Obama, one of my first acts would be the immediate implementation the following gun violence prevention initiatives to reduce gun access by children, criminals and terrorists without any undue restrictions on responsible gun owners like myself.

#1 Mandatory criminal background checks for all gun sales

Current Federal law only requires Licensed gun dealers to perform criminal background checks. Consequently in 32 States "private dealers"/individuals can legally sell guns at thousands of annual gun shows, countless flea markets and yard sales, and out of homes, backpacks, car trunks or on street corners without running a background check or asking to see an ID. Only the first gun sale from a "Federally Licensed" gun dealer requires documentation and all "secondary" gun sales are legally allowed to take place without any paperwork or record keeping. As a result, convicted felons and suspected terrorists can and do buy guns simply because there is no background check required or conducted.

#2 Require responsible and safe gun storage for all firearms unless they are in the owners direct control

Approximately 40% of American homes have at least one firearm. Most guns used in child accidental gun injuries and deaths and teenage suicides come from within the home. Responsible guns owners safely secure their guns -unloaded and locked unless they are in their direct control. Seventeen States have such a safe-storage/Child Access Prevention requirement and all such states have a lower incidence of gun injuries and deaths among children compared to states without such a requirement.

#3 Allow Law Enforcement to maintain and share critical "crime-gun" trace data

Current Federal law prohibits the BATF from sharing crime gun trace data even among law enforcement agencies. In 2000 the BATF used crime-gun trace data to determine that just 1% of licensed gun dealers provided 57% of guns used in crime. Instead of supporting law enforcement efforts to identify and arrest illegal gun dealers, the Bush administration made police the enemy of "gun rights", requiring prison sentences for any police official that shares crime-gun trace data with even other law enforcement.

#4 Restore and improve the Federal Ban on Assault Weapons

The 10 year Federal ban on 19 specific military style assault weapons beginning in 1994 was supported by every major US law enforcement organization representing over 450,000 police officers. Although so called assault weapons make up approximately 1% of the US gun stock, statistics clearly show that they are the weapon of choice by gangs, career criminals and terrorist organizations and disproportionately show up in crimes. The Bush administration let the ban expire in 2004 even though the ban resulted in a dramatic 66% reduction in these weapons used in crime over the 10 year period.

#5 Repeal the Federal law giving Immunity to the gun industry

In 2007 Congress and the Bush administration enacted legislation prohibiting the ability to sue the gun industry even for negligence and blatantly marketing to criminals. For instance, the Tech 9 semi-automatic pistol, one of the guns used at the Columbine High School massacre, was marketed as "having a finish resistant to fingerprints", the Hertzel 22 cal handgun is marketed as "capable of penetrating 48 layers of soft body armor" and the Barrett 50 cal sniper rifle with a 2 mile range and designed to penetrate steel, is touted as being able to "take down an aircraft with one shot" and they tell you where to put it. Osama bin Laden bought a dozen of these US made Barrett's when fighting the Soviets in Afghanistan! The gun industry makes, markets and sells inherently dangerous product (like automobiles, knives and drugs- all regulated) and they should be held accountable for their actions.

#6 Enact National Consumer Product Safety Commission regulations for firearms

Congress has prohibited the National Consumer Product Safety Commission from oversight of the gun industry. Therefore guns have NO consumer safety, manufacturing or marketing standards for how they are sold. Consequently toy guns and teddy bears have more regulations on how they're made than real guns that result in an average of 34,000 deaths a year in the US. The gun industry flaunts their "freedom" from regulation and continues to make and sell guns without minimal safety features and in some cases knowingly market their deadly products directly to criminals and terrorists without any accountability. Massachusetts, which is home to Smith and Wesson, the nation's largest handgun manufacturer, enacted the first in the nation Consumer Protection regulations for firearms and such oversight had no negative impacts on legitimate gun makers, dealers or buyers in the State.

#7 Create incentives for the gun industry to make "personalized guns"

According to gun maker Smith and Wesson, guns could be made with personal recognition technology such that only the intended user could fire the gun. This practical technological solution would save the lives of countless victims of gun violence, accidents and suicides each year. It could also help save the lives of the 17% of police officers killed in the line of duty by a criminal accessing the officer's gun. In fact, in an agreement with the Clinton administration, Smith and Wesson promised to invest a portion of net profits into "personalized gun technology".

If President Obama and Congress were to enact just these 7 national gun violence prevention initiates, the 34,000 annual gun deaths and 80,000 injuries would be reduced to a fraction without any undue hardship on responsible gun owners like myself. I'm hopeful. President-elect Obama knows all too well that 70-80 percent of the 80 or more gun deaths every day in the US are non-white, urban Americans. He also knows that an overwhelming majority of Americans, including gun owners and law enforcement officers, support criminal background checks for all gun sales, the Ban on assault weapons and responsible safety standards and regulations for gun makers, dealers and owners that do not infringe upon Second Amendment rights.

Now all that is needed is a loud public outcry and the political will for sensible and responsible domestic gun policy.


Anonymous said...

At this point in time I'm afraid our only only, since Obi Wan isn't around, is that Rahm Emmanuel agrees with Bill Clinton that the AWB cost the Dems control of Congress in 1994 and that Emannuel persuades Obama to make sure Reid/Pelosi don't send up any anti gun legislation.

It looks like the Dems are on their way to picking up AK and MN in the senate.

Things are bleak indeed.

Anonymous said...

#2 clearly violates an individual's right to privacy. The government has not right to tell me what I can and cannot do in the privacy of my own home, whether it is storing a gun or having some strange, previously prohibited form of sex.

What I do in my bedroom is my business and how I keep my firearm in my room is also my business.

Anonymous said...

And what is the response from the industry? This guy is clearly pulling the talking points used over the last couple years by the gun-control crowd. The notion of taking out a plane with a 50 is absurd unless you take it out on the tarmac with a round to the engine as special forces do.

Anonymous said...

Here's a question...If 1% of the FFLs sell guns used in 57% of the crime, how is that the ATF cannot do anything about it? Are they that incompetent?

The Freeholder said...

"Of the average 42,000 auto deaths in the US every year approximately 21,000 are unrestrained in the vehicle, 13,000 were alcohol-related deaths and 2,100 were children. We can change these horrific numbers."

Clearly, we must have:

#1 Mandatory criminal background checks for all auto sales

#2 Require responsible and safe storage for all autos unless they are in the owners direct control

#3 Allow Law Enforcement to maintain and share critical auto accident data

#4 Restore and improve the Federal Ban on autos that are too fast, too loud or too big

#5 Repeal the Federal law giving Immunity to the auto industry

#6 Enact National Consumer Product Safety Commission regulations for autos

#7 Create incentives for the gun industry to make "personalized autos"

Sounds pretty silly when you put it that way, doesn't it? After all, the auto is an inanimate object, just like a car.

But if we're really serious about holding down the death toll, the since more people die by autos than firearms, we must solve this problem first!

Anonymous said...

According to gun maker Smith and Wesson, guns could be made with personal recognition technology such that only the intended user could fire the gun.

I hope the gun companies realize how long their stupid comments and positions last. Just on principle I would like to see the board of S&W horse whipped for this stupid position they took years ago.

I won't buy their product to this very day.

Anonymous said...

Its coming folks and nothing will stop it. They learned their lessons and will make this ban permanant and there will be no loop holes. No one is going to fight this. I hear nothing but apathy from gun owners.

Anonymous said...

I think that they're not only going to ban everything, they're going to start taking them away! It's going to get ugly. They give mis-information and false information to the masses
(a. k. a. : "MSM" AND campaigns, such as Obam's), then they take surveys and polls that show "This is what the majority of the people want", then they act! It all sounds so familiar. Just ask the Brit's and Aussies.
Life Member

Anonymous said...

The list is ridiculous. Such foolery ranks the author in there with Bill Ruger's 10 round magazine debacle.
A person might as well wheel Jim Brady around with these proposals.

Anonymous said...

Unfortunately, the smart grabbers --and some of them [i]are[/i] -- understand the principle of "aim small, miss small." By making "sensible gun control" their mantra and by going after one thing at a time, they can appear to be surgical. I know shooters who have little problem conceding black rifles to the enemy (despite my calm, reasoned arguments to the contrary).

Some will concede "gun show loopholes," altho dealers at every show I've been to in Virginia must call the State Police instant background check hotline for every sale. Side deals in the parking lot might well be going on, but I've not seen any. They could as easily agree to meet somewhere else, anyway, to consummate the sale.

Safety locks are stupid, but plenty of parents who otherwise would support us see no harm in them: "It's for the children."

I start getting angry whenever I hear the word "sensible" or the phrase "It's for the children" no matter what the issue.

The grabbers are using codes like this to drive a wedge between us. If this comes down to a war of semantics, we need to arm ourselves in turn.

This is why I prefer to use the term "victim disarmament" over "2nd Amendment rights." It plays to detestable victimhood, but it's really a form of verbal judo. It aligns the grabbers with the thugs we're protecting ourselves and our loved ones against. Our real defense is concealed.

Anonymous said...

You have the tv shows, what are you going to do about it? My senator could care less.

Anonymous said...

fidanon @ 5:24,

What do you expect MB to do about it? All he can do is what the rest of us should be doing: contacting Senators and Representatives and sending $ to the NRA.

I am amused by the people who think MB can single handedly do things such as elect Fred or stop a gun ban. Get real people!

Anonymous said...

This article gave me a mini panic attack.

Thanksfully, the comments are full of articulate, truthful, freedom-minded responses.

Anonymous said...

He has a soap box. Use it like the hollywood people used theirs to get BHO elected. I'll make sure I write Hillary Clinton and let her know I want her to vote against an AWB. What do you think will happen?

Anonymous said...

I think that Clark Kent is on to something with his suggestion to call this new wave of intended gun control "Victim Disarmament". We should all start using that and when the uninformed ask "What's that?", we can elaborate.
Thanks Clark.
Life Member

Health News said...

yeah truly a great site.I really enjoyed my visit.